The MitraClip and survival in patients with mitral regurgitation at high risk for surgery: A propensity-matched comparison

67Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background We compared 30-day and 1-year survival among high-risk mitral regurgitation (MR) patients treated with the MitraClip (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, IL) with matched non-surgically treated patients from the Duke Echocardiography Laboratory Database (DELD). Methods and Results High-risk patients with 3+/4+ MR managed non-surgically between years 2000 and 2010 in the longitudinal DELD were matched to high-risk MitraClip patients. Patient matching was performed using the method of nearest available Mahalanobis distance metric within calipers defined by the propensity score. Kaplan-Meier estimates and stratified Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival at 30 days and 1 year. Among 953 high-risk DELD patients available for matching, 30-day and 1-year mortality were 6.5% and 26.2%. Close matches were obtained for 239 of the 351 MitraClip patients. The 30-day mortality in MitraClip patients was lower (4.2%) when compared with matched DELD patients (7.2%). The 1-year relative risk of mortality of the MitraClip compared with non-surgical treatment was 0.64 (95% CI 0.45-0.91; log-rank P =.013). These results in favor of the MitraClip remained significant upon further adjustment for baseline differences between groups (P =.043). Conclusions This matched comparison of severe MR patients at high surgical risk supports the safety of the MitraClip relative to medical therapy at 30 days and a survival benefit at 1 year.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Velazquez, E. J., Samad, Z., Al-Khalidi, H. R., Sangli, C., Grayburn, P. A., Massaro, J. M., … Krucoff, M. W. (2015). The MitraClip and survival in patients with mitral regurgitation at high risk for surgery: A propensity-matched comparison. American Heart Journal, 170(5), 1050-1059.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free