Comparison of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cellulitis and from osteomyelitis in a Taiwan Hospital, 2016–2018

19Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes superficial infections such as cellulitis or invasive infections such as osteomyelitis; however, differences in MRSA isolates from cellulitis (CL-MRSA) and from osteomyelitis (OM-MRSA) at the same local area remain largely unknown. A total of 221 MRSA isolates including 106 CL-MRSA strains and 115 OM-MRSA strains were collected at Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan between 2016 and 2018, and their genotypic and phenotypic characteristics were compared. We found that OM-MRSA isolates significantly exhibited higher rates of resistance to multiple antibiotics than CL-MRSA isolates. Genotypically, OM-MRSA isolates had higher proportions of the SCCmec type III, the sequence type ST239, and the spa type t037 than CL-MRSA isolates. Besides the multidrug-resistant lineage ST239-t037-SCCmecIII more prevalent in OM-MRSA, higher antibiotic resistance rates were also observed in several other prevalent lineages in OM-MRSA as compared to the same lineages in CL-MRSA. Furthermore, when prosthetic joint infection (PJI) associated and non-PJI-associated MRSA strains in osteomyelitis were compared, no significant differences were observed in antibiotic resistance rates between the two groups, albeit more diverse genotypes were found in non-PJI-associated MRSA. Our findings therefore suggest that deep infections may allow MRSA to evade antibiotic attack and facilitate the convergent evolution and selection of multidrug-resistant lineages.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peng, K. T., Huang, T. Y., Chiang, Y. C., Hsu, Y. Y., Chuang, F. Y., Lee, C. W., & Chang, P. J. (2019). Comparison of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cellulitis and from osteomyelitis in a Taiwan Hospital, 2016–2018. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060816

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free