Factors Associated with Weight Loss After Endoscopic Transoral Outlet Reduction (TORe)

7Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic transoral outlet reduction (TORe) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment option for weight regain after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). Factors that predict successful weight loss after TORe are incompletely understood. The aims of this study were to evaluate procedural factors and patient factors that may affect percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) after TORe. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients after TORe. The primary outcomes were %TBWL at 6 and 12 months based on four procedural factors: purse-string (PS) vs. non-purse-string (NPS) suture pattern, gastric pouch sutures (N), change in the diameter of the gastrojejunal anastomosis, and change in the length of the gastric pouch. Secondary outcomes included patient factors that affected weight loss. Results: Fifty-one patients underwent TORe. Weight loss for completers was 11.3 ± 7.6% and 12.2 ± 9.2% at 6 and 12 months. There was a correlation between %TBWL and change in pouch length at 6 and 12 months and number of sutures in the pouch at 6 months. The difference in %TBWL between PS and NPS groups at 6 months (PS, n=21, 12.3 ± 8.5% and NPS, n=8, 8.7 ± 3.7%) and 12 months (PS, n=21, 13.5 ± 9.2% and NPS, n=5, 7.0 ± 7.9%) did not reach statistical significance. For secondary outcomes, depression was associated with %TBWL. Conclusion: Change in pouch length and number of sutures in the pouch correlated positively while depression correlated negatively with weight loss after TORe. Further studies are needed to understand these effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meyers, M. H., Swei, E. C., Tarter, W., Schoen, J., Rothchild, K., Pratap, A., & Sullivan, S. A. (2023). Factors Associated with Weight Loss After Endoscopic Transoral Outlet Reduction (TORe). Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 27(8), 1587–1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05695-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free