Single-port laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy in obesity (>25 kg/m2)

13Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Single-port cholecystectomy has emerged as an alternative technique to reduce the number of ports and improve cosmesis. Few previous studies have assessed obesity-related surgical outcomes following single-port cholecystectomy. In this study, technical feasibility and surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) and robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) in obese patients were investigated. Methods: We conducted a two-center collaborative study and retrospectively reviewed initial experiences of RSSC and SPLC in patients whose body mass index was over 25 kg/m2. Medical records of patients were reviewed. Clinical characteristics and short-term oncologic outcomes were considered and compared between SPLC and RSSC groups. Results: RSSC and SPLC were performed in 39 and 78 patients, respectively. In comparative analysis, the total operative time was longer in the RSSC group (109.92 minutes vs. 60.99 minutes; P ±.001). However, requiring additional port for completion of surgical procedure was less frequent in the RSSC group (0% vs. 12.8%; P =.029). Immediate postoperative pain score was not significantly different between the two groups (4.95 vs. 5.00; P =.882). However, pain score was significantly lower in the RSSC group at the time of discharge (1.79 vs. 2.38; P =.010). Conversion to conventional multiport cholecystectomy, intraoperative bile spillage, or complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups (P >.05). Conclusions: SPLC and RSSC could be safely performed in selected patients with high body mass index, showing no significant clinical differences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jang, E. J., Roh, Y. H., Kang, C. M., Kim, D. K., & Park, K. J. (2019). Single-port laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy in obesity (>25 kg/m2). Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2019.00005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free