Current concepts of harm-benefit analysis of animal experiments - Report from the AALAS-FELASA working group on harm-benefit analysis - Part 1

89Citations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

International regulations and guidelines strongly suggest that the use of animal models in scientific research should be initiated only after the authority responsible for the review of animal studies has concluded a wellthought- out harm-benefit analysis (HBA) and deemed the project to be appropriate. Although the process for conducting HBAs may not be new, the relevant factors and algorithms used in conducting them during the review process are deemed to be poorly defined or lacking by committees in many institutions. This paper presents the current concept of HBAs based on a literature review. References on cost or risk benefit from clinical trials and other industries are also included. Several approaches to HBA have been discovered including algorithms, graphic presentations and generic processes. The aim of this study is to better aid and harmonize understanding of the concepts of ‘harm’, ‘benefit’ and ‘harm-benefit analysis’.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brønstad, A., Newcomer, C., Decelle, T., Everitt, J. I., Guillen, J., & Laber, K. (2016). Current concepts of harm-benefit analysis of animal experiments - Report from the AALAS-FELASA working group on harm-benefit analysis - Part 1. Laboratory Animals, 50(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677216642398

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free