Re-Examination of the Reciprocal Relation Between Intrinsic Motivation and Competence Beliefs in Math Using the Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Framework

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Previous studies employing cross-lagged panel models (CLPMs) found mixed results regarding reciprocal relations between competence beliefs and intrinsic motivation. CLPMs have been criticized for leading to erroneous causal inference in certain situations. Two datasets were analyzed regarding reciprocal relations between competence beliefs and intrinsic motivation with the alternative random-intercept cross-laged panel models (RI-CLPMs). One dataset contained 670 2nd to 3rd grade students (M = 8.80 years old, 98% white, 55.7% female) and the second dataset contained 542 2nd to 4th grade students (M = 7.96 years old, 76.7% native German speakers, no information on ethnicity, 50.2% female) in Germany. The results revealed little to no evidence for reciprocal relations between the constructs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paschke, P., Steinmayr, R., Mertens, A., Neubauer, A. B., & Spinath, B. (2025). Re-Examination of the Reciprocal Relation Between Intrinsic Motivation and Competence Beliefs in Math Using the Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Framework. Child Development, 96(6), 2201–2220. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.70028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free