Could health court be a solution?

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tort compensation system has been known as inefficient system for delivering compensation as well as non-legal remedy such as explanation and apology. Essentially, the system is costly and lengthy as there is considerable delay between the accident and its compensation, and also it is inequitable and unfair between injured patients. There are some serious obstacles to sue doctors because of the difficulty in obtaining expert evidence. Thus, only few injured patients get compensation. This paper aims to examine the health court as a substitute for the present tort litigation system and explore its merits for solving medical negligence claims. The employed methodology for doing this research is a library one. The data collected both electronically (PubMed, Medline & Google Scholar) and manually (based on different papers, journals, books & researches) and the key words and phrases such as "Medical Negligence", "Tort system" and "Health Court" were used to obtain public policy studies, case analyses, law review articles and healthcare analysis articles. © Canadian Center of Science and Education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khodapanahandeh, S., & Naaishah Hambali, S. (2013, October 29). Could health court be a solution? Asian Social Science. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n15p138

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free