Performance Analysis of Different Firearm Suppressor Structures

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A powerful soundwave from shooting a firearm can travel great distances harming the shooter as well as anyone or anything standing nearby. To address this, a non-typical firearm suppressor is used. A suppressor muffles the soundwave to a level that is usually safe for the shooter and its environment. A suppressor usually has 3-4 main parts that highly influence its effectiveness. The study aims to investigate how non-typical baffle design and placement selection influence the suppressor effectiveness. The study consists of 162 different non-typical baffle design configurations. Suppressors with 3 to 9 baffles, angled from 30 to 60 degrees as well as rounded from 10 mm to 30 mm radius, are simulated in a CFD environment. Suppressors with the best designs were then produced and evaluated on a firing range. At the firing range, a result of 32.24 dB delta was achieved and was only 4,67% different than the result presented in the CFD study, which was 30.8 dB, respectively. The 9 straight geometry baffle, angled at 30 degrees, suppressor, with an average chamber volume proved to be the most efficient and combined with a large initial chamber was the most efficient design in this study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giedraitis, V., & Kilikevičius, A. (2024). Performance Analysis of Different Firearm Suppressor Structures. Mechanika, 30(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.35196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free