Stratification to predict the response to antioxidant treatment in critical care: A translational study

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of stratification to identify and target antioxidant therapy for animal models of lethal sepsis and in patients who develop sustained hypotension. Methods: Rats were subjected to sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture. Animals were divided into two groups: those with high and low plasma levels of interleukin-6. Following stratification, N-acetylcysteine plus deferoxamine or saline was administered to animals starting 3 and 12 hours after surgery. N-Acetylcysteine plus deferoxamine or placebo was administered within 12 hours of meeting the inclusion criteria in hypotensive patients. Results: N-Acetylcysteine plus deferoxamine increased survival in the cecal ligation and puncture model when administered 3 and 12 hours after sepsis induction. When dividing animals that received antioxidants using plasma interleukin-6 levels, the protective effect was observed only in those animals with high IL-6 levels. The antioxidant effect of N-acetylcysteine + deferoxamine was similar in the two groups, but a significant decrease in plasma interleukin-6 levels was observed in the high-interleukin- 6-level group. Compared with patients treated with antioxidants in the lowinterleukin- 6 subgroup, those in the high-interleukin-6 subgroup had a lower incidence of acute kidney injury but were not different in terms of acute kidney injury severity or intensive care unit mortality. Conclusion: Targeting antioxidant therapy to a high inflammatory phenotype would select a responsive population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ritter, C., Constantino, L., Michels, M., Gonçalves, R. C., Fraga, C., Damásio, D., & Dal-Pizzol, F. (2020). Stratification to predict the response to antioxidant treatment in critical care: A translational study. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, 32(1), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20200016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free