MMX mesalazine for the induction of remission of mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis: Efficacy and tolerability in specific patient subpopulations

54Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Two phase III studies have evaluated mesalazine (mesalamine) with MMX (Multi Matrix System) technology in patients with active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Aim: To determine the efficacy of MMX mesalazine for the induction of clinical and endoscopic remission in specific subgroups of patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Methods: Data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analysed (517 out-patients). Patients were randomized to receive MMX mesalazine [2.4 g/day (once daily or 1.2 g twice daily) or 4.8 g/day (once daily)] or placebo for 8 weeks. Results: The percentages of patients treated with MMX mesalazine, 2.4 or 4.8 g/day, in clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8 were similar and significantly (P < 0.05) greater than placebo in subgroups stratified by disease extent, disease severity and gender and among patients not previously receiving low-dose 5-aminosalicylic acid. Among patients transferring directly from prior low-dose oral 5-aminosalicylic acid, MMX mesalazine 4.8 g/day was significantly (P = 0.018) more effective than placebo in inducing clinical and endoscopic remission. Efficacy over placebo did not reach significance in patients transferring directly to MMX mesalazine 2.4 g/day. Conclusion: MMX mesalazine is effective in active UC regardless of disease extent, disease severity, gender and previous, low-dose, 5-ASA therapy. © 2008 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lichtenstein, G. R., Kamm, M. A., Sandborn, W. J., Lyne, A., & Joseph, R. E. (2008). MMX mesalazine for the induction of remission of mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis: Efficacy and tolerability in specific patient subpopulations. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 27(11), 1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03688.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free