Long-term follow-up after aortic root replacement with the Shelhigh® biological valved conduit: A word of caution!

15Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse long-term results of aortic root replacement with the Shelhigh® NR-2000C conduit. METHODS: From January 2001 to October 2005, 63 patients with a median age of 62 years underwent aortic root replacement with a Shelhigh® conduit. Aneurysm (27%), aortic valve endocarditis (30%) and acute type A aortic dissection (33%) were the predominant indications for the surgery. Fifty-four patients (86%) were entered in the follow-up study with the end-points of death, aortic root-related reoperation and endocarditis. RESULTS: The overall 30-day mortality rate was 8% (n = 5). The median follow-up was 9.5 years (range 0-14.2 years). In total, 13 (24%) deaths occurred during follow-up; of these, 4 were directly conduit-related. The overall estimated survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 85 ± 5, 79 ± 6 and 71 ± 7%, respectively. Reoperation was necessary in 10 (19%) patients due to endocarditis (n = 5), aortic stenosis (n = 3), pseudoaneurysm due to detachment of the right coronary artery (n = 1) and detachment of the non-coronary leaflet (n = 1). The overall estimated rate of freedom from aortic root-related reoperation at 1, 5 and 10 years was 83 ± 5, 79 ± 6 and 64 ± 7%, respectively. Endocarditis of the prosthesis was reported in 9 (17%) patients; of whom, 5 patients required reoperation and 4 were treated medically. In 1 patient with endocarditis, a stroke was reported due to a thromboembolic event. CONCLUSIONS: The first long-term follow-up after aortic root replacement with the Shelhigh® BioConduit revealed a relatively high rate of death and very high rate of reoperations due to endocarditis, aorto-ventricular disconnection and structural valve failure. This may be potentially connected to the nature of the implanted valved conduit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sahin, A., Müggler, O., Sromicki, J., Caliskan, E., Reser, D., Emmert, M. Y., … Holubec, T. (2016). Long-term follow-up after aortic root replacement with the Shelhigh® biological valved conduit: A word of caution! European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 50(6), 1172–1178. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw167

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free