Fracture resistance of primary molars restored with endocrowns versus zirconia crowns (An in vitro study)

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of primary molars restored with endocrowns compared to prefabricated zirconia crowns. Material and Methods: Twelve sound, defect-free primary second molars were selected and divided into two groups: group I included 6 molars restored with zirconia crowns, while group II included 6 teeth restored with endocrowns. For both groups access cavity was prepared for the teeth to open pulp chamber. Fracture resistance of both groups was tested using a universal testing machine. Results: Zirconia crown showed statistically significantly higher mean fracture resistance than Endocrown (P-value = 0.001, Effect size = 2.72). Conclusion: Pulpotomized primary molars restored with Zirconia crowns showed significantly higher mean fracture resistance compared to primary molars restored with endocrowns, meanwhile both restorations have shown higher mean fracture resistance than the maximum biting force in children.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sabbah, A. A. H., & Kamel, M. H. (2021). Fracture resistance of primary molars restored with endocrowns versus zirconia crowns (An in vitro study). Brazilian Dental Science, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2021.v24i4.2626

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free