Compressive Strength Assessment of Soil–Cement Blocks Incorporated with Waste Tire Steel Fiber

20Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The rapid growth in waste tire disposal has become a severe environmental concern in recent decades. Recycling rubber and steel fibers from wasted tires as construction materials helps counteract this imminent environmental crisis, mainly improving the performance of cement-based materials. Consequently, the present article aims to evaluate the potential use of waste tire steel fibers (i.e., WTSF) incorporated in the manufacture of soil–cement blocks, considering their compressive resistance as a primary output variable of comparison. The experimental methodology applied in this study comprised the elaboration of threefold mixtures of soil–cement blocks, all of them with 10% by weight in Portland cement, but with different volumetric additions of WTSF (i.e., 0%, 0.75%, and 1.5%). The assessment’s outcomes revealed that the addition of 0.75% WTSF does not have a statistically significant influence on the compressive resistance of the samples. On the contrary, specimens with 1.5% WTSF displayed a 20% increase (on average) in their compressive strength. All the tested samples’ results exhibited good agreement with the minimum requirements of the different standards considered. The compressive resistance was evaluated in the first place because it is the primary provision demanded by the specifications for applying soil–cement materials in building constructions. However, further research on the physical and mechanical properties of WTSF soil–cement blocks is compulsory; an assessment of the durability of soil–cement blocks with WTSF should also be carried out.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rocha, J. H. A., Galarza, F. P., Chileno, N. G. C., Rosas, M. H., Peñaranda, S. P., Diaz, L. L., & Abasto, R. P. (2022). Compressive Strength Assessment of Soil–Cement Blocks Incorporated with Waste Tire Steel Fiber. Materials, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051777

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free