Total oxygen uptake with two maximal breathing techniques and the tidal volume breathing technique: A physiologic study of preoxygenation

68Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Three common methods for preoxygenation are 3 min of tidal breathing, four deep breaths taken within 30 s (4DB), and eight deep breaths taken within 60 s (8DB). This report compares these three techniques in healthy volunteers. Methods: Five healthy subjects breathed through a mouth-piece and wore a nose clip; oxygen was delivered at 180 1/ruin via a low-resistance T-piece. Each subject repeated each of the three oxygenation techniques four times. The end-tidal fraction of oxygen was measured, and the oxygen uptake at the mouth was measured breath by breath. The additional difference between oxygen uptake at the mouth during the period of breathing oxygen (as compared with that during air breathing) was taken to represent the total oxygen sequestrated into body stores. Results: The mean ± SD maximum end-tidal fraction of oxygen after the 4DB method was 0.83 ± 0.09, which was significantly less than either after the 3-min method (0.92 ± 0.01; P < 0.04) or after the 8DB method (0.91 ± 0.04; P < 0.03). The mean additional oxygen taken up during oxygenation with the 4DB method was 1.67 ± 0.45 1, which was significantly lower than with the 3-min method (2.23 ± 0.85 1; P < 0.04) or with the 8DB method (2.53 ± 0.74 1; P < 0.01). There were no significant differences for these variables between the 3-min and 8DB methods. Conclusions: For the physiologic measurements that were made, both the 3-min and the 8DB method are superior to the 4DB method. The 3-min and 8DB methods seem to be equally effective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pandit, J. J., Duncan, T., & Robbins, P. A. (2003). Total oxygen uptake with two maximal breathing techniques and the tidal volume breathing technique: A physiologic study of preoxygenation. Anesthesiology, 99(4), 841–846. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200310000-00015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free