Making ‘safer injecting’ matter for people who inject image and performance enhancing drugs

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Image and performance-enhancing drugs (IPEDs) are primarily injected intramuscularly or subcutaneously, yet traditional harm reduction strategies, focused on blood-borne virus prevention, often overlook the specific health enhancement goals of people who use IPEDs. This study advocates for a collaborative approach to safer injecting practices, informed by the lived-living experiences of people injecting IPEDs, to develop targeted messaging that aligns with their unique motivations. Thirty participants who inject IPEDs were recruited through community networks and partnerships. The study used qualitative focus groups and semi-structured interviews to explore injection practices and safety strategies. Data analysis followed an inductive, line-by-line approach, identifying themes related to injection methods and safer techniques, drawing on matters-of-concern. Stigma and misinformation about IPED injection practices were prevalent, contributing to a heightened risk of infection. Participants expressed anxiety about injection site reactions and reported limited knowledge of safe techniques, with poor injecting literacy leading to risky behaviours like needle reuse and inadequate hygiene. Importantly, participants highlighted that IPED injecting knowledge is often shared through peer support networks. This research calls for reframing harm reduction to focus on health enhancement, optimising injecting techniques, and integrating evidence-based resources, empowering peer-led harm reduction to better support the health aspirations of this population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piatkowski, T., Kill, E., Weith, S., Reeve, S., Cox, L., Coomber, R., … Ferris, J. (2026). Making ‘safer injecting’ matter for people who inject image and performance enhancing drugs. Health (United Kingdom), 30(4), 516–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251388294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free