Relationship between Board Remuneration and Financial Performance in the Kenyan Financial Services Industry

  • Ruparelia R
  • Njuguna A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Executive pay is a major issue in the corporate governance debate. As well in practice as in theory debate still exists how executive pay levels and structures can be explained. This paper provides an overview of 16 theories that have been used in the literature to explain the phenomenon. The theories can be classified into three types of approaches; 1) the value approach; 2) the agency approach; and 3) the symbolic approach. A critical assessment of the theories shows that the dominant use in the literature of the perfect contracting approach of agency theory neglects: 1) the socially determined symbolic value that executive pay could represent, and 2) the contextual conditions under which executive pay is set. A more conclusive understanding of executive pay would be based on considering executive pay as an outcome of socially constructed corporate governance arrangements in which the actors involved have considerable discretion to influence the outcomes. Incorporating such a view in attempts to explain executive pay provides a more conclusive explanation of the recurrent debate on executive pay in theory and practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruparelia, R., & Njuguna, A. (2016). Relationship between Board Remuneration and Financial Performance in the Kenyan Financial Services Industry. International Journal of Financial Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v7n2p247

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free