Osseous sequestration in cattle: 110 Cases (1987-1997)

29Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective-To determine risk factors for development of sequestra in cattle and identify factors associated with a successful outcome. Design-Retrospective study. Animals-110 cattle. Procedure-Medical records of cattle treated at veterinary teaching hospitals in North America were reviewed. To determine risk factors for osseous sequestration, breed, age, and sex of cattle with osseous sequestration were compared with breed, age, and sex of all other cattle admitted during the study period. Results-110 cattle were included in the study. Three had 2 sequestra; thus, 113 lesions were identified. Most sequestra were associated with the bones of the extremities, most commonly the third metacarpal or third metatarsal bone. Ninety-two animals were treated surgically (ie, sequestrectomy), 7 were treated medically, 3 were initially treated medically and were then treated surgically, and 8 were not treated. Follow-up information was available for 65 animals treated surgically and 6 animals treated medically. Fifty-one (78%) animals treated surgically and 5 animals treated medically had a successful outcome. Cattle that were 6 months to 2 years old had a significantly increased risk of developing a sequestrum, compared with cattle <6 months old. Cattle in which sequestrectomy was performed with the aid of local anesthesia were significantly more likely to undergo 2 or more surgical procedures than were cattle in which sequestrectomy was performed with the aid of general anesthesia. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Results suggest that sequestrectomy will result in a successful outcome for most cattle with osseous sequestration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valentino, L. W., St Jean, G., Anderson, D. E., Desroches, A., Kersting, K., Lopez, M. J., … Cohen, N. D. (2000). Osseous sequestration in cattle: 110 Cases (1987-1997). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 217(3), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2000.217.376

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free