Tweets and votes: A four-country comparison of volumetric and sentiment analysis approaches

11Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study analyzes different methodological approaches followed in social media literature and their accuracy in predicting the general elections of four countries. Volumetric and unsupervised and supervised sentiment approaches are adopted for generating 12 metrics to compute predicted vote shares. The findings suggest that Twitter-based predictions can produce accurate results for elections, given the digital environment of a country. A cross-country analyses helps to evaluate the quality of predictions and the influence of different contexts, such as technological development and democratic setups. We recommend future scholars to combine volume, sentiment and network aspects of social media to model voting intentions in developing societies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmed, S., Jaidka, K., & Skoric, M. M. (2016). Tweets and votes: A four-country comparison of volumetric and sentiment analysis approaches. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2016 (pp. 507–510). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14773

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free