Impact of type of medical specialist involvement in chronic illness care on emergency department use

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Medical specialist physicians may act as either consultants or co-managers for patients managed in primary care settings. We assessed whether the type of specialist involvement affected emergency department (ED) use for patients with chronic diseases. Methods: In total, 709 primary care patients with arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes or congestive heart failure were followed for one year using survey and administrative data. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to compare all-cause ED use according to specialist involvement (none, co-manager or consultant). Results: In total, 240 (34%) patients visited the ED. ED use did not differ between those with specialist involvement and those without it, either as co-managers (adjusted OR = 1.06, 95% CI = [0.61, 1.85]) or consultants (adjusted OR = 0.97, 95% CI = [0.63, 1.50]). Discussion: The type of specialist involvement is not associated with all-cause ED use in primary care patients with chronic diseases. Indications for co-management should be further investigated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Larochelle, J. L., Feldman, D. E., & Levesque, J. F. (2016). Impact of type of medical specialist involvement in chronic illness care on emergency department use. Healthcare Policy, 11(3), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2016.24536

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free