Honesty, candour, and transparency: Clinical implications

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In advance of a medical conference on the duty of candour for medical ethics educators, this paper discusses the duty of candour as a significant development in the culture of medicine. Those who teach medical ethics need to assess its implications for their own practice. It is also a duty that needs to be critically examined in light of both patients’ interests and clinical work environments if it is to be practical and not meaningless rhetoric. Two examples of ways in which that critical examination might take place are outlined.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papanikitas, A. (2016). Honesty, candour, and transparency: Clinical implications. London Journal of Primary Care, 8(2), 30–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2016.1146464

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free