Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance among conventional versus herbal irrigants in root canal treated teeth: In vitro study

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of conventional irrigants and herbal extracts materials which helps to resist fracture of endodontically treated teeth. 75 maxillary human permanent incisor teeth instrumented using ProTaper rotary files till apical size(F4). Instrumented samples divided into 5 groups with n = 15 based on various irrigants used. Group I: normal saline, Group II: 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), Group III: 2% chlorohexidine, Group IV: 10% Azadirachta indica (neem extract) and Group V: 10% Ocimum sanctum (tulsi extract).After that, root canals were proceeded to be filled by using single gutta-percha cone and Sealapex sealer. Specimens were then prepared and loaded until root fracture occurred. Maximum mean flexural strength of dentin (fracture resistance) was obtained from group treated with 2% chlorohexidine and 10% neem extract. Least fracture resistance was observed with 5% NaOCl. Herbal irrigants can be used as an alternative to NaOCl as they exhibit high fracture resistance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sinha, D. J., Rani, P., Vats, S., Bedi, K., Sharma, N., & Manjiri, H. N. (2023). Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance among conventional versus herbal irrigants in root canal treated teeth: In vitro study. Australian Endodontic Journal, 49(S1), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free