A comparative study of four methods for analysing repeated measures data

13Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper compares four alternative statistical methods for the analysis of repeated measures data. The data set involves fatty acid composition of red blood cell membrane examined after acute MI and is characterized by a moderate sample size, unbalanced repeated measures and high within-individual correlations. Two methods are based on individual curve fitting and two on the random effects model. Results yielded by the four methods differed. The advantages and disadvantages of the methods are discussed. Assumptions required for the valid application of these methods are tested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manor, O., & Kark, J. D. (1996). A comparative study of four methods for analysing repeated measures data. Statistics in Medicine, 15(11), 1143–1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960615)15:11<1143::AID-SIM227>3.0.CO;2-M

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free