Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity–theory, teachers’ attitudes, and creativity-based practices

4Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Numerous studies highlight the benefits of incorporating creativity in teaching, but practical experience shows that putting these theories and policies into practice often lacks the necessary resources. The current study focuses on three aspects of creativity in teaching: (a) Theoretical–how do policy documents and educational researchers refer to creativity in teaching and what are their recommendations regarding its implementation in the education system? (b) Attitudes–what do teachers know and what are their positions regarding the integration of creativity in teaching? (c) Practical–whether and how teachers use creativity-based practices in their teaching. We conducted a descriptive analysis of 36 teachers’ lesson plan performances and 11 interviews to answer the research questions. Findings revealed a gap between theory and practice: despite the teachers’ positive attitudes about integrating creativity in teaching, many of them did not apply these contents. Ways to minimize this gap between theory and practice are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maor, R., Paz-Baruch, N., Mevarech, Z., Grinshpan, N., Levi, R., Milman, A., … Zion, M. (2025). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity–theory, teachers’ attitudes, and creativity-based practices. Educational Studies, 51(5), 958–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2024.2371091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free