Validation of alternative methods of data normalization in gene co-expression studies

59Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Motivation: Clusters of genes encoding proteins with related function, or in the same regulatory network, often exhibit expression patterns that are correlated over a large number of conditions. Protein associations and gene regulatory networks can be modelled from expression data. We address the question of which of several normalization methods is optimal prior to computing the correlation of the expression profiles between every pair of genes. Results: We use gene expression data from five experiments with a total of 78 hybridizations and 23 diverse conditions. Nine methods of data normalization are explored based on all possible combinations of normalization techniques according to between and within gene and experiment variation. We compare the resulting empirical distribution of gene x gene correlations with the expectations and apply cross-validation to test the performance of each method in predicting accurate functional annotation. We conclude that normalization methods based on mixed-model equations are optimal. © The Author 2004. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reverter, A., Barris, W., McWilliam, S., Byrne, K. A., Wang, Y. H., Tan, S. H., … Dalrymple, B. P. (2005). Validation of alternative methods of data normalization in gene co-expression studies. Bioinformatics, 21(7), 1112–1120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free