Behind the SNC-Lavalin Scandal: The Transnational Diffusion of Corporate Diversion

7Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

At issue in the SNC-Lavalin scandal was a new tool of corporate criminal law: remediation agreements. Introduced in 2018, remediation agreements allow corporate diversion and create an alternative to the prosecution of corporations suspected of criminal wrongdoing. This article examines why the federal government adopted and chose this particular new tool. Drawing on a wide-ranging documentary record, I argue that this reform was the product of transnational lawmaking and the ongoing influence of Canada's international commitments to prohibit and punish foreign bribery. The article shows how international criticism of Canada's lacklustre anti-foreign bribery enforcement record catalyzed cross-national policy diffusion and learning from other states. This led Canada to adopt corporate diversion, which promised greater enforcement, and also led Canada to adopt a form of the practice with legislative and judicial limits that narrowed the chances of any company - including SNC-Lavalin - of obtaining a remediation agreement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Acorn, E. (2021). Behind the SNC-Lavalin Scandal: The Transnational Diffusion of Corporate Diversion. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 892–917. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423921000664

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free