A phenomenological interpretation of the variation in dialysate volume with dwell time in CAPD

105Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Intraperitoneal fluid volume (IPV) changes versus time were followed in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) using a simple volume recovery method. In each patient dialysates containing 1.36 and 3.86 percent glucose as an osmotic agent were investigated. The patients' IPV versus time data were fitted to a function determined by four 'arbitrary' coefficients, from which both the initial ultrafiltration (UF) rate immediately following intraperitoneal (i.p.) fluid instillation and the 'final' peritoneal-to-blood fluid absorption rate could be assessed. The peritoneal osmotic conductance to glucose, that is, the peritoneal ultrafiltration coefficient (K(f)), times the peritoneal osmotic reflection coefficient to glucose (σ(g)), K(f) σ(g), was determined using two related approaches. K(f) σ(g) is a major determinant of the transperitoneal volume exchange, and it was calculated to be 3.54 ± 0.85 (± SE) and 3.81 ± 0.52 μl/min/mm Hg, respectively, depending on the assumption employed. K(f) σ(g) was further analysed according to a three-pore model of membrane permeability to determine the possible range of K(f) and σ(g) compatible with a peritoneal small solute sieving coefficient (Φ) ranging from 0.3 to 0.61. According to these calculations both K(f) and σ(g) ranged from 0.043 to 0.081 (ml/min/mm Hg and dimensionless, respectively). The maximal peritoneal lymph flow (L) realistic according to this analysis, and compatible with a measured total peritoneal-to-blood fluid absorption rate of 1.25 ± 0.14 ml/min, was 0.75 ml/min, the most plausible values, however, falling between 0.3 to 0.5 ml/min.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stelin, G., & Rippe, B. (1990). A phenomenological interpretation of the variation in dialysate volume with dwell time in CAPD. Kidney International, 38(3), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1990.227

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free