Even 1 × n edge-matching and jigsaw puzzles are really hard

7Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We prove the computational intractability of rotating and placing n square tiles into a 1 × n array such that adjacent tiles are compatible-either equal edge colors, as in edge-matching puzzles, or matching tab/pocket shapes, as in jigsaw puzzles. Beyond basic NP-hardness, we prove that it is NP-hard even to approximately maximize the number of placed tiles (allowing blanks), while satisfying the compatibility constraint between nonblank tiles, within a factor of 0.9999999702 (On the other hand, there is an easy 1/2 -approximation). This is the first (correct) proof of inapproximability for edge-matching and jigsaw puzzles. Along the way, we prove NP-hardness of distinguishing, for a directed graph on n nodes, between having a Hamiltonian path (length n - 1) and having at most 0.999999284(n - 1) edges that form a vertex-disjoint union of paths. We use this gap hardness and gap-preserving reductions to establish similar gap hardness for 1 × n jigsaw and edge-matching puzzles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bosboom, J., Demaine, E. D., Demaine, M. L., Hesterberg, A., Manurangsi, P., & Yodpinyanee, A. (2017). Even 1 × n edge-matching and jigsaw puzzles are really hard. Journal of Information Processing, 25, 682–694. https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.25.682

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free