Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and Law: A Reflective Analysis of 14 Regulation Structures

  • Girard M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is a key element of an efficienthealthcare system. Are healthcare systems structured to facilitate IPC?Methods and findings: Fourteen jurisdictions were chosen and researched usinglegal and social sciences databases. Generally, there was a lack of understandingof the legal principles in literature on policy and IPC. That aside, every jurisdic-tion had acts and regulation specific to health professions. There were numerouspathways to professional regulation and no clear consensus. Regarding IPC pres-ence in legal text, there were two main integration pathways: professional-basedand organization-based approaches.Conclusion: Although the practice of IPC is important, its presence in regulationis still discrete. If the aim is to strengthen IPC, there must be more socio-legalresearch to properly address and inform policymakers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Girard, M.-A. (2019). Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and Law: A Reflective Analysis of 14 Regulation Structures. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22230/jripe.2019v9n2a285

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free