Shared decision making for infants born at the threshold of viability: A prognosis-based guideline

44Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Making prenatal decisions regarding resuscitation of extremely premature infants, based on gestational age alone is inadequate. We developed a prognosis-based guideline. Study Design: We followed a five step approach and used the AGREE II framework: (1) systematic review and critical appraisal of published guidelines; (2) identification of key medical factors for decision making; (3) systematic reviews; (4) creation of a multi-disciplinary working group and (5) external consultation and appraisal.Result:No published guideline met high-quality appraisal criteria. Survival, neurodevelopmental disability, quality of life of child and parents, and maternal mortality and risk of long-term morbidity were identified as key for quality decision-making. Eighteen stakeholders (including parents) advocated for the incorporation of parents' values and preferences in the process.Conclusion:A novel framework, based on prognosis, was generated to guide when early intensive and palliative care may both be offered to expectant parents. Pre-implementation assessment is underway to identify barriers and facilitators to putting in practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lemyre, B., Daboval, T., Dunn, S., Kekewich, M., Jones, G., Wang, D., … Moore, G. P. (2016). Shared decision making for infants born at the threshold of viability: A prognosis-based guideline. Journal of Perinatology, 36(7), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.81

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free