First-line Afatinib in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–mutant Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Clinical Retrospective Study

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: We sought to analyse epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFR-MT) metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with afatinib as first-line therapy in a clinical setting. The outcomes of cases, especially those harbouring rare mutations, were reviewed. Methods: A single-centre retrospective study of 85 patients with NSCLC treated with first-line afatinib was performed. Demographics, clinical data, and treatment information were used to assess the effects of age, mutation types (common/uncommon), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), presence of brain metastasis, and other factors on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Median age was 63 years. ECOG PS ≥2 was present in 10.6% of cases. A total of 11.8% of all cases had brain metastasis at first presentation and 41.2% had uncommon mutations. The median PFS was 14.9 months; the median OS was 33.9 months. 91.8% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse effects. Dose reductions were required for 30.6% of cases. Patients with major uncommon mutations had PFS of similar lengths to those with common mutations. Age, presence of brain metastasis, ECOG PS of ≥2 and presence of exon 20 insertions correlated negatively with PFS and OS. Conclusions: Afatinib is an effective first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-MT NSCLC. The drug is well tolerated, with good response rates across a broad spectrum of patients. Given its high efficacy in major uncommon mutations, it should be considered as first-line treatment in this subset.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chow, D. Y. L., So, T. H., Leung, D. K. C., Tse, R. P. Y., & Lau, K. S. (2022). First-line Afatinib in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–mutant Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Clinical Retrospective Study. Hong Kong Journal of Radiology, 25(3), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjr2217459

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free