Reliability and validity of the adapted Finnish version of the early onset scoliosis questionnaire (EOSQ-24)

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: EOSQ-24 is a disease specific patient-reported outcome score used to assess the quality of life in patients with early-onset scoliosis. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the EOSQ-24 to Finnish language and to assess the reliability and validity of the translation. Methods: Cross-cultural adaptation and cross-cultural validation were performed to the Finnish translation of the EOSQ-24. Patients and/or their caretakers were then recruited to assess the psychometric properties of the translation. We assessed the internal consistency, test–retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and discriminative abilities. One-hundred-and-three patients filled the questionnaire. Results: EOSQ-24 was successfully translated into Finnish. The translation showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.94), satisfactory item-total correlations ranging from 0.6 to 0.9, and moderate to strong inter item correlations. Test–retest reliability ranged from 0.7 to 0.96 indicating good to excellent agreement. Patients with neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis reported lower EOSQ-24 scores when compared to patients’ idiopathic and congenital scoliosis. There was a significant negative correlation between major curve and EOSQ-24 scores in patients with idiopathic early onset scoliosis. Conclusion: The internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the measure were found to be satisfactory. A marked ceiling effect was observed, indicating a potential source of error.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haapala, H., Salonen, A., Suominen, E., Syvänen, J., Repo, J., Matsumoto, H., … Saarinen, A. (2024). Reliability and validity of the adapted Finnish version of the early onset scoliosis questionnaire (EOSQ-24). Spine Deformity, 12(4), 1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00861-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free