Random Alms

  • Halmos P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

1. Statement of the problem. Consider the problem of distributing one pound of gold dust at random among a countably infinite set of beggars. Let the beggars be enumerated and let the procedure for distribution be as follows: the first beggar is given a random portion of the gold; the second beggar gets a random portion of the remainder;-* and so on ad infinitum. In this description the phrase "random portion" occurs an infinite number of times: it seems reasonable to require that it have the same interpretation each time. To be precise: let xi (j 0, 1, 2, * *) be the amount received by the jth beggar. Let the distribution of xo be given by a density function p(X): (1) p(X) O, O < X < 1; (2) fP(X)dX = 1; b (3) P(a < xo < b) = p(X) dX, 0 < a < b ? 1. After the first beggar has received his alms and the amount of gold dust left is ,u (i.e. xo = 1-j,), the value of xi will be between 0 and A. The uniformity requirement mentioned above means that the proportion of Au that the second beggar is to receive is again determined by the probability density p: in other words the conditional probability that xi be between XAu and (X + dX),u, given that xo = 1-Iu, is p(X) dX. In symbols: bi ~~~~~~~b (4) P(aA < xi< bpIxo-d,u)=fp()dX. Writing a = aju, ,B = bAu, (4) becomes (5) P(ae < XI < x < b I xi = 1-)=f P) dX, a < b < ?A. This assumption completely determines (in terms of p) the joint distribution of the whole infinite sequence { xO, xl, X2,

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Halmos, P. R. (1944). Random Alms. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 15(2), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731283

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free