Anterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Perioperative risk factors and 30-day outcomes

30Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Operative management of lower back pain often necessitates anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Specific pathoanatomic advantages and indications exist for both approaches, and few studies to date have characterized comparative early outcomes. Methods: Adult patients undergoing elective ALIF or TLIF operations were abstracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) years 2011-2014. Univariate analyses were performed by surgery cohort for each outcome and adjusted for demographic/clinical variables (age 65, sex, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification score, functional status, inpatient/outpatient status, smoking, hypertension, Charlson Comorbidity Index) using multivariable regression. Means, standard errors, mean differences (B), odds ratios (ORs), and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Significance was assessed at P, .05. Results: Of 8263 subjects (ALIF: 4325, TLIF: 3938), ALIF subjects were younger, less obese, less physically impaired, and had significantly lower rates of hypertension, diabetes, coagulopathy, and previous cardiac surgery. On multivariable analysis, ALIF associated with shorter operative time (B ¼ 11.80 minutes, 95% CI [16.48, 7.12]; P, .001). Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was associated with increased incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs; OR ¼ 1.57, 95% CI [1.10, 2.26]; P ¼ .013) and of blood transfusions (OR ¼ 1.19, 95% CI [1.04, 1.37]; P ¼ .012). Multivariate analysis also demonstrated TLIF associated with shorter hospital length of stay (B ¼ 0.27 days, 95% CI [0.54, 0.01]; P ¼ .041), and fewer cases of pneumonia (OR ¼ 0.55, 95% CI [0.32, 0.94]; P ¼ .029) and prolonged ventilator dependency (OR ¼ 0.33, 95% CI [0.12, 0.84]; P ¼ .021). Conclusions: Comparatively, ALIF patients experienced decreased operative time and decreased incidence of postoperative UTIs and blood transfusions. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients were more likely to suffer postoperative pulmonary complications and longer hospital stays. Our data support the notion that both anterior and transforaminal surgical approaches perform comparably in context of 30-day perioperative outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Upadhyayula, P. S., Curtis, E. I., Yue, J. K., Sidhu, N., & Ciacci, J. D. (2018, October 1). Anterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Perioperative risk factors and 30-day outcomes. International Journal of Spine Surgery. ISASS. https://doi.org/10.14444/5065

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free