Cholesteatoma surgery in the pediatric population: remaining challenges in the era of mastoid obliteration

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To present the first pediatric study on the safety and efficacy of mastoid obliteration using S53P4 bioactive glass (BAG) for cholesteatoma surgery. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. Inclusion criteria were pediatric cases (≤ 18 years) and at least at least one year of follow-up including non-echo planar diffusion-weighted MRI to assess cholesteatoma recidivism. Both canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) procedures were evaluated. Results: A total of 61 cases (56 patients) were included. Most cases had an otologic history before the development of the cholesteatoma. CWU procedure was performed in 18 cases (30%) and CWD procedure in 43 cases (70%). The cholesteatoma recidivism rate was 33% after a mean follow-up period of 58 months. Kaplan–Meier curve estimated a 5-year recidivism rate of 40%. Few complications were seen that were all minor and resolved spontaneously or after local or systemic treatment. Control of the infection (merchant grade 0–1) was achieved in 98% of the cases. Closure of the air–bone gap within 20 dB was achieved in 22% of the cases with complete audiometric evaluation. Conclusion: In this MRI-controlled study, we show the safety and efficacy of S53P4 BAG for mastoid obliteration in a pediatric cholesteatoma cohort. Postoperative complications were both rare and minor, and a dry ear was achieved in almost all patients. Nevertheless, persistent hearing loss and the apparent high recidivism rate reflect the challenging nature of pediatric cholesteatoma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kroon, V. J., Mes, S. W., Borggreven, P. A., van de Langenberg, R., Colnot, D. R., & Quak, J. J. (2023). Cholesteatoma surgery in the pediatric population: remaining challenges in the era of mastoid obliteration. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 280(4), 1713–1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07669-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free