Tumor Embolization through Meningohypophyseal and Inferolateral Trunks is Safe and Effective

9Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Skull base tumors are commonly supplied by dural branches of the meningohypophyseal and inferolateral trunks. Embolization through these arteries is often avoided due to technical challenges and inherent risks however, successful embolization can be a valuable surgical adjunct. We aimed to review the success and complications in our series of tumor embolizations through the meningohypophyseal and inferolateral trunks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with tumor treated with preoperative embolization at our institution between 2010 and 2020. We reviewed the following data: patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, endovascular embolization variables, and surgical results including estimated blood loss, the need for transfusion, and operative time. RESULTS: Among 155 tumor embolization cases, we identified 14 patients in whom tumor embolization was performed using the meningohypophyseal (n = 13) or inferolateral (n = 4) trunk. In this group of patients, on average, 79% of tumors were embolized. No mortality or morbidity from the embolization procedure was observed in this subgroup of patients. The average estimated blood loss in the operation was 395 mL (range, 200-750 mL). None of the patients required a transfusion, and the average operative time was 7.3 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Some skull base tumors necessitate embolization through ICA branches such as the meningohypophyseal and inferolateral trunks. Our series demonstrates that an effective and safe embolization may be performed through these routes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raz, E., Cavalcanti, D. D., Sen, C., Nossek, E., Potts, M., Peschillo, S., … Shapiro, M. (2022). Tumor Embolization through Meningohypophyseal and Inferolateral Trunks is Safe and Effective. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 43(8), 1142–1147. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7579

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free