Good Me Bad Me: Prioritization of the Good-Self During Perceptual Decision-Making

  • Hu C
  • Lan Y
  • Macrae C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

People display systematic priorities to self-related stimuli. As the self is not a unified entity, however, it remains unclear which aspects of the self are crucial to producing this stimulus prioritization. To explore this issue, we manipulated the valence of the self-concept (good me vs. bad me) — a core identity-based facet of the self — using a standard shape-label association task in which participants initially learned the associations (e.g., circle/good-self, triangle/good-other, diamond/bad-self, square/bad-other), after which they completed shape-label matching and shape-categorization tasks, such that attention was directed to different aspects of the stimuli (i.e., self-relevance and valence). The results revealed that responses were more efficient to the good-self shape (vs. other shapes), regardless of the task that was undertaken. A hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis indicated that this good-self prioritization effect was underpinned by differences in the rate of information uptake. These findings demonstrate that activation of the good-self representation exclusively facilitates perceptual decision-making, thereby furthering understanding of the self-prioritization effect.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, C.-P., Lan, Y., Macrae, C. N., & Sui, J. (2020). Good Me Bad Me: Prioritization of the Good-Self During Perceptual Decision-Making. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.301

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free