Three-microphone probe bias errors for acoustic intensity and specific acoustic impedance

  • Lawrence J
  • Whiting E
  • Gee K
  • et al.
5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In acoustic intensity estimation, adding a microphone at the probe center removes errors associated with pressure averaging. Analytical bias errors are presented for a one-dimensional, three-microphone probe for active intensity, reactive intensity, and specific acoustic impedance in a monopole field. Traditional estimation is compared with the Phase and Amplitude Gradient Estimator (PAGE) method; the PAGE method shows an increased bandwidth for all three quantities. The two- and three-microphone methods are compared experimentally, showing reduced bias errors with three-microphone PAGE for active and reactive intensity, whereas using two microphones is preferred for specific acoustic impedance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lawrence, J. S., Whiting, E. B., Gee, K. L., Rasband, R. D., Neilsen, T. B., & Sommerfeldt, S. D. (2018). Three-microphone probe bias errors for acoustic intensity and specific acoustic impedance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(2), EL81–EL86. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5022688

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free