Conflicting preferences within females: Sexual selection versus species recognition

22Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Preferences for mates within and between species are often harmonious, as traits that females prefer are usually more developed in conspecifics than heterospecifics. This need not be the case, however. When it is not, conflict between these arenas of mate choice can be resolved if females attend to different cues for each task. But this raises the potential for correlations among preferences to limit the opportunity for these two processes to operate independently. Here, we show that, within individual female pygmy swordtails (Xiphophorus pygmaeus), directional preferences for conspicuous ornamentation are inversely associated with discrimination against a sympatric heterospecific, Xiphophorus cortezi. Thus, mate choice among and within species need not be separate, independent processes; instead, they can be mechanistically intertwined. As a consequence, different arenas of mate choice can constrain one another, even when females assess multiple cues. © 2011 The Royal Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosenthal, G. G., & Ryan, M. J. (2011). Conflicting preferences within females: Sexual selection versus species recognition. Biology Letters, 7(4), 525–527. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free