Evidence, consequences, and angle of strike of bird-window collisions

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

We used direct observation to record what, if any, evidence was measurable when a bird hit the outside surface of plate glass during 18 field experiments to evaluate several products to deter window strikes. A total of 1,356 strikes were witnessed over 508 d and 1,202 h of observation; 678 (50%) left no evidence of a collision, and 190 (14%) resulted in an immediate fatality. For 10 experiments, 1,261 detailed individual flightpaths were drawn over 235 d and 799 h of observation; 916 (73%) were strikes and 22 (2%) of these resulted in an immediate fatality. We recorded 822 (90%) flightpaths that hit perpendicular or within 40° on either side of perpendicular to the glass surface; 94 (10%) hit with a glancing blow of greater than 40° on either side of perpendicular. Perpendicular strikes resulted in 689 (84%) of individuals flying off immediately with no sign of impairment, 113 (14%) stunned, and 20 (2%) fatalities. Glancing blow strikes resulted in 81 (86%) flying off with no sign of impairment, 11 (12%) stunned, and 2 (2%) fatalities. Considering that 50% of bird-window collisions leave no measurable evidence of a strike, and as much as 70% of stunned victims likely succumb from a collision, annual mortality may be minimally 1.28 billion-3.46 billion or as high as 1.92 billion-5.19 billion in the United States, with potentially billions more worldwide.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klem, D., Saenger, P. G., & Brogle, B. P. (2024). Evidence, consequences, and angle of strike of bird-window collisions. Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 136(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1676/23-00045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free