Maternal Power Assertion in Discipline and Moral Discourse Contexts: Commonalities, Differences, and Implications for Children's Moral Conduct and Cognition

85Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Parental power assertion is traditionally studied in the behavioral domain - discipline triggered by the child's immediate misbehavior - but rarely in the cognitive domain - parent-child discussions of the child's past misbehavior. Maternal power assertion was observed in "do" and "don't" discipline contexts from 14 to 45 months and in the context of mother-child discourse about a recent misbehavior at 56 months. Mothers' use of power cohered across the "do," "don't," and discourse contexts, but its implications were domain specific. Power assertion in the "don't" discipline context predicted behavioral outcomes (more moral conduct at 56 and 73 months, less antisocial conduct at 73 months) but not cognitive outcomes (moral cognition at 56 and 73 months). Power assertion in the discourse context predicted less mature moral cognition but not moral or antisocial conduct. Mothers' high Neuroticism predicted more power assertion in all three contexts. Child effects were examined.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kochanska, G., Aksan, N., & Nichols, K. E. (2003). Maternal Power Assertion in Discipline and Moral Discourse Contexts: Commonalities, Differences, and Implications for Children’s Moral Conduct and Cognition. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.949

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free