A 'Fresh Eyes' Look at improving the effectiveness of Engineering Group Design Projects

4Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Whilst there are many benefits of the use of Engineering Group Design Projects (EGDPs) in undergraduate engineering programmes, there are a number of common issues that can compromise their effectiveness as a learning medium. A study was carried out to identify such issues, which used creative thinking methods to identify ways in which they might be addressed. Focus was upon aligning project structure with that typical of industrial practice - a goal enhanced by the fact that the author was from an industrial rather than an academic background. As a result, a proposed EGDP structure was developed and trialled at Plymouth University. A key feature of this structure was that the minutes of students' weekly project management meetings were recorded in a spreadsheet-based template which doubled as the project mark sheet. Each individual task recorded in the minutes was peer assessed on completion to adjust the group mark awarded by the lecturer, thus reflecting individual contributions. The trial was a resounding success with excellent student feedback. Resulting design work was of exceptional quality, and the age-old issue of non-contributing group members was effectively eliminated. © 2013 J. Davies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kyte, A. (2013). A “Fresh Eyes” Look at improving the effectiveness of Engineering Group Design Projects. Engineering Education, 8(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.11120/ened.2013.00009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free