Non-Contact Monitoring of Inhalation-Exhalation (I:E) Ratio in Non-Ventilated Subjects

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The inhalation-exhalation (I:E) ratio, known to be an indicator of respiratory disease, is the ratio between the inhalation phase and exhalation phase of each breath. Here, we report on results from a non-contact monitoring method for the determination of the I:E ratio. This employs a depth sensing camera system that requires no sensors to be physically attached to the patient. A range of I:E ratios from 0.3 to 1.0 over a range of respiratory rates from 4 to 40 breaths/min were generated by healthy volunteers, producing a total of 3,882 separate breaths for analysis. Depth information was acquired using an Intel D415 RealSense camera placed at 1.1 m from the subjects' torso. This data was processed in real-time to extract depth changes within the subjects' torso region corresponding to respiratory activity. This was further converted into a respiratory signal from which the I:E ratio was determined (I:Edepth). I:Edepth was compared to spirometer data (I:Espiro). A Bland Altman analysis produced a mean bias of -0.004, with limits of agreement [-0.234, 0.227]. A linear regression analysis produced a line of best fit given by I:Edepth = 1.004 × I:Espiro - 0.006, with 95% confidence intervals for the slope [0.988, 1.019] and intercept [-0.017, 0.004]. We have demonstrated the viability of a non-contact monitoring method for determining the I:E ratio on healthy subjects breathing without mechanical support. This measure may be useful in monitoring the deterioration in respiratory status and/or response to therapy within the patient population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Addison, P. S., Antunes, A., Montgomery, D., & Borg, U. R. (2024). Non-Contact Monitoring of Inhalation-Exhalation (I:E) Ratio in Non-Ventilated Subjects. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 12, 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3496196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free