Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce

94Citations
Citations of this article
176Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A dominant assumption in the street-level bureaucracy literature is that bureaucrats’ discretion is curtailed by automated systems. Drawing on survey and factual data (n = 549) from Dutch inspectors, we test the effect of automation on enforcement style and whether this can be explained by discretion-as-perceived. Our results show that automation (1) increases bureaucrats’ legal and accommodation style; (2) discretion-as-perceived does not mediate this effect; but (3) automation does decrease discretion-as-perceived. The main implication is that we do not find empirical evidence for curtailment and future research should move beyond discretion to understand effects of digital systems on bureaucrats’ behaviour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Boer, N., & Raaphorst, N. (2023). Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce. Public Management Review, 25(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free