Vasopressin/nitroglycerin infusion vs. esophageal tamponade in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding: A randomized controlled trial

34Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vasopressin infusion and esophageal tamponade are still widely used to arrest variceal bleeding, but no objective evidence exists on the superiority of either of the two procedures. In this study, 108 cirrhotic patients bleeding from varices were included in a prospective, randomized trial to investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of balloon tamponade (using the Sengstaken‐Blakemore tube for esophageal varices and the Linton‐Nachlas tube for gastric varices) (n = 52) and intravenous vasopressin infusion (0.4 to 0.8 μ/min) plus intravenous nitroglyeerin infusion (40 to 400 μg/min) (n = 56). Both treatments were maintained for 24‐hr. The hemostatic efficacy according to the intention to treat was 86.5% for tamponade and 66% for pharmacological therapy (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found with respect to rebleeding during the first 72 hr after treatment, mortality rate or side effects. These results suggest that esophageal tamponade is more effective than vasopressin/nitroglycerin infusion in the treatment of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.(HEPATOLOGY 1990;11:964‐968.). Copyright © 1990 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teres, J., Planas, R., Panes, J., Salmeron, J. M., Mas, A., Bosch, J., … Rodés, J. (1990). Vasopressin/nitroglycerin infusion vs. esophageal tamponade in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding: A randomized controlled trial. Hepatology, 11(6), 964–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840110609

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free