Effectiveness of Multi-Modal Lazravs and Multi-Modal Spiritual - Religious, of Physical Symptoms and Quality Life in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia

  • Mikaeili N
  • Hajloo N
  • Narimani M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of several Lazarus multimodal therapy and spiritual-religious multimodal on specific physical symptoms and quality of life in patients with functional dyspepsia was designed and implemented. Method: the study is a quasi-experimental and functional study which is done with pretest-posttest control group. The population includes all gastrointestinal patients whom are sent to clinics in Tehran district5, and samples consisted of 54 patients with FD, they will be selected using available Non Probability Sampling and random assignment. Instrument of the study are index of physical symptoms and quality of life in patients with functional dyspepsia (NDI) and data are analyzed using analysis of covariance and using SPSS software. Results: findings show that in the experimental groups, there is a significant difference in life quality and physical symptoms at the time of subjects entering the study and after treatment; however, there was no significant difference for the control group. Also, there is no significant difference among treatment groups in terms of effectiveness of physical symptoms and quality of life in post-test and the follow-up in the majority of components. According to the above results and consistent with other studies, the possibility of benefiting from above interventions in patients with functional dyspepsia was provided.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mikaeili, N., Hajloo, N., Narimani, M., & Pournikdast, S. (2015). Effectiveness of Multi-Modal Lazravs and Multi-Modal Spiritual - Religious, of Physical Symptoms and Quality Life in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 5(12), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.2/2015.5.12/2.12.534.544

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free