Role of repeated lung injury and genetic background in bleomycin-induced fibrosis

127Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Current hypotheses of the pathogenesis of many forms of pulmonary fibrosis suggest that (i) a stimulus results in repeated or prolonged episodes of lung injury, and (ii) genetic factors modulate the outcome of the injury. The commonly employed single-exposure bleomycin model results in only temporary fibrosis. Therefore, we evaluated whether repeated bleomycin exposures, in the setting of a genetic background more likely to develop a T helper 2 (Th2) response, would induce prolonged fibrosis. Lung fibrosis was induced by intratracheal bleomycin injection, either as a single exposure or as three consecutive exposures. We found that bleomycin induced a Th2-like environment in both Th1-biased C57BL/6J and Th2-biased DBA/2 mice. We also found histologic changes and collagen increases consistent with lung injury/fibrosis at early time points, but prolonged fibrosis only after multiple exposures in the Th2-biased DBA/2 mice. We also determined if impaired healing of bleomycin-induced injury would prolong fibrosis in the C57BL/ 6J mice. Endothelial nitric oxide (which protects endothelial cells from oxidant-induced injury) synthase knockout animals on a C57BL/6J background also had prolonged fibrosis, similar to DBA/2 mice, after multiple bleomycin exposures. This was specific to eNOS, as inducible nitric oxide synthase knockout animals cleared the fibrosis as effectively as wild-type C57BL/ 6J mice. This data indicate that healing of injury/fibrosis after bleomycin is complex and can be determined by a number of genetic and environmental factors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chung, M. P., Monick, M. M., Hamzeh, N. Y., Butler, N. S., Powers, L. S., & Hunninghake, G. W. (2003). Role of repeated lung injury and genetic background in bleomycin-induced fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, 29(3 I), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2003-0029OC

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free