Abstract
Objective: To mechanically evaluate different systems used for incisors retraction. Methods: Three different methods for incisors retraction using 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel wire were evaluated. The samples were divided into three groups: Group A (retraction arch with 7-mm high vertical hooks); Group G3 (elastic chain attached to the miniimplant and to the 3-mm stainless steel hook soldered to the retraction arch); Group G6 (elastic chain attached to the mini-implant and to the 6-mm stainless steel hook soldered to the retraction arch). A dental mannequin was used for evaluation in order to simulate the desired movements when the device was exposed to a heat source. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test were used (p < 0.05). Results: The results demonstrated that Groups G3 and G6 exhibited less extrusion and less incisor inclination during the retraction phase (p < 0.05). With regard to incisor extrusion, statistically significant differences were observed between Groups A and G3, and between Groups A and G6 (p < 0.05). Regarding incisor inclination, statistically significant differences were observed between the three systems evaluated (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Arches with 6-mm vertical hooks allow the force to be applied on the center of resistance of the incisors, thus improving mechanical control when compared with the other two systems. © 2013 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ruellas, A. C. de O., Pithon, M. M., & dos Santos, R. L. (2013). Maxillary incisor retraction: Evaluation of different mechanisms. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 18(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000200021
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.