Comparison of outcomes following intravenous magnesium compared with intravenous labetalol and oral nifedipine in 355 pregnant Han Chinese women with preeclampsia

2Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As per the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in 2013, magnesium sulfate is the gold standard for the management of preeclampsia, but it has a short action time that does not provide stable maintenance of blood pressure. Labetalol is currently recommended as first-line treatment by the national UK guidance. This study included 355 pregnant Han Chinese women with preeclampsia and aimed to compare outcomes following intravenous magnesium compared with intravenous labetalol and oral nifedipine. Women received 4 g intravenous magnesium sulfate followed by the maintenance dose of 1 g/h intravenous magnesium sulfate (MS cohort, n = 104) or intravenous labetalol (LB cohort, n = 115), or oral nifedipine (NF cohort, n = 136). Therapy success: systolic blood pressure ∼140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure ∼90 mm Hg, therapy failure: persistent systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mm Hg after maximum dosage of therapy (EL). Women of all cohorts successfully decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressures at EL as compared to them before therapy conditions (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peng, Z., Zhang, J., Xiao, Y., & Dong, W. (2023). Comparison of outcomes following intravenous magnesium compared with intravenous labetalol and oral nifedipine in 355 pregnant Han Chinese women with preeclampsia. Medicine (United States), 102(46). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free