In this paper I want to explore reasons for replacing Binding Theory based on the anaphor-pronoun dichotomy by a Binding Theory allowing more domains restricting/defining anaphoric dependencies. This will, thus, have consequences for the partitioning of anaphoric elements, presupposing more types of 'anaphors'/'pronouns' than standard Binding Theory offers us.
CITATION STYLE
Everaert, M. (2005). On binding domains. Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2005.29
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.