Abstract
Although stabilisation has been widely debated by the recent literature, there has been relatively little discussion about how the governments of countries affected by armed violence have themselves engaged with the concept. This article looks at Colombia where, since the election of president Iván Duque in 2018, the government has increasingly emphasised stabilisation. We argue that stabilisation is for the Duque administration a discursive device that allows them to navigate the contradiction between their critical position towards the peace process and the necessity to fulfil internal and international obligations. We also argue that, in spite of its apparent novelty, the concept of stabilisation has long roots in Colombia, going back to the policies of consolidation developed under the presidencies of Álvaro Uribe and Juan Manuel Santos. The analysis of the antecedents of consolidation raises doubts about the appropriateness of Duque’s stabilisation for tackling Colombia’s post-conflict challenges. The case of Colombia highlights the risk that stabilisation might displace more transformative approaches to peacebuilding and the continuity between contemporary stabilisation and previous interventions.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Piccolino, G., & Ruette-Orihuela, K. (2021). The turn from peacebuilding to stabilisation: Colombia after the 2018 presidential election. Third World Quarterly, 42(10), 2393–2412. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1951201
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.